Crazy Like a (Perfectly Normal) Bereaved Parent: In Defense of Rick and Karen Santorum

By Amy Kuebelbeck

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum and his wife, Karen, have been vilified in recent days for how they handled the death of their premature baby in 1996. Much of the criticism has been uninformed, some of it heartlessly cruel.

According to this 1997 story in the Philadelphia Inquirer, Karen Santorum underwent fetal surgery to try to correct a birth defect in their developing baby. She developed a life-threatening post-surgical infection, which triggered premature labor. Their son, Gabriel, was born too prematurely to survive. He lived for two hours and died in their arms in the middle of the night.

The couple kept Gabriel in their hospital room for the rest of the night and brought his body home the next morning, keeping vigil with their older children until holding a private funeral at home and burial later that day.

Some TV pundits recently opined that spending this time with Gabriel’s body was “crazy” and “weird.” Online commenters piled on, typing snarky comments that were much worse.

They are wrong.

Granted, many Americans are ignorant or squeamish about birth and death. But here are two key facts:

Spending time with a baby’s body after death is normal and healthy, and giving families the opportunity and support to do so if they wish is now the evidence-based medical standard of care. See this position statement from an international collaboration of parent advocacy groups, this information from the Mayo Clinic, or these recommendations from the American Pregnancy Association.

Involving siblings also is considered normal and healthy, even for babies born very prematurely, like the Santorums’ baby. A human being at 20 weeks’ gestation looks remarkably well-developed, just small. (Any child born alive is legally considered a baby, not a fetus; all states require the reporting of a live birth at any gestational age. And most expectant parents view their child as a baby, not a clinical “fetus,” whether born alive or not.)

Some resistance to the idea of spending time with a baby’s body is rooted in outdated thinking about miscarriage, stillbirth, and infant death. As childbirth became medicalized beginning in the early 20th century, the subject became taboo. In a misguided attempt to protect parents from grief, doctors and nurses typically refused to allow parents to see a baby who was stillborn or dying, and parents were advised to forget about the baby and have another one. The bodies often were buried by the hospital in common graves or disposed of as medical waste. Mothers and fathers were deprived of their only chance to parent their child. Perhaps caregivers meant well, but for many parents this approach caused long-lasting grief and emotional trauma.

Fortunately, beginning in the 1970s, most U.S. hospitals have now adopted more enlightened practices. In part because of the loving work of parent advocates whose profound loss was minimized or ignored in the past, many newly bereaved parents are now encouraged to hold their child’s body and to view that tender act as healthy and natural. They are invited to create memories with their child: to bathe their baby, give their baby a name, and take photographs. (See the work of photographer Todd Hochberg and Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep.) Nurses help parents collect priceless keepsakes such as footprints. The baby’s body is treated with respect, and caregivers acknowledge the parents’ emotional need to affirm their baby’s existence. Organizations such as Share Pregnancy & Infant Loss Support, the Pregnancy Loss and Infant Death Alliance, RTS Bereavement Services of Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation, Sands UK, and the MISS Foundation continue to do pioneering work in advocating for parents and providing training for caregivers.

Spending time with the baby’s body at home is less common, at least in the United States. The Santorums were ahead of their time in doing so, thanks to Karen Santorum’s professional experience as a neonatal intensive care nurse, whose job included caring for babies who died. In some other cultures, New Zealand for example, keeping watch over a loved one’s body at home is the norm, and it’s leaving the body alone at a morgue or funeral home that would be considered “crazy” or “weird.” But home funerals and wakes are quietly returning in the U.S., as described in a recent story on National Public Radio. Although legal requirements vary, it is legal in all U.S. states to provide at least some aspect of loved ones’ care after death, according to home funeral advocacy groups.

The logistics are relatively simple for a baby. Our book, A Gift of Time: Continuing Your Pregnancy When Your Baby’s Life Is Expected to Be Brief, includes poignant stories from several families who brought their babies home, either for a few hours en route from hospital to funeral home or for the entire vigil until the funeral and burial or cremation.

For parents, who have already nurtured their child from conception through birth and death, reclaiming centuries-old traditions of caring for the dead in the intimacy of home can be another meaningful way of caring for their baby. Research has found that bringing the baby’s body home for viewing helped parents with their grief.

Those who can’t imagine doing any of this because they haven’t experienced this heartbreak should count themselves fortunate. Those who have experienced it can imagine it all too well. For those yet to come, because others had the courage and compassion to fight outdated thinking and practices, their profound loss will be just a little easier to bear.

Amy Kuebelbeck is co-author along with Deborah L. Davis, Ph.D., of A Gift of Time: Continuing Your Pregnancy When Your Baby’s Life Is Expected to Be Brief. She also is author of Waiting with Gabriel: A Story of Cherishing a Baby’s Brief Life and is editor of www.perinatalhospice.org, a clearinghouse of information about perinatal hospice and palliative care for parents and caregivers.

This column was originally published at PsychologyToday.com and is reprinted with permission. The original piece can be found here.

Leave a comment

Filed under Consumer Health, Death and Grief, Emotional Health, Ethics, Health and Medicine, Privacy, Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s